Bengaluru
S. T. Somashekhar, in a recent statement, emphasized the significance of maintaining a robust dialogue within the House and advocated against the notion of boycotting sessions, particularly the Belgaum session. He expressed disappointment at the perception of a potential boycott, highlighting the need to address critical issues within the legislative framework. Drawing attention to specific developmental initiatives, Somashekhar highlighted the inspection of Ullalu lake development work in the Yeshavantpur constituency, along with the installation of a 300mm diameter drainage pipeline by BWSSB. He underscored the importance of such initiatives in local development, emphasizing that these concerns should not warrant a boycott of parliamentary sessions. He defended the government’s stance, stressing that smaller issues should not lead to disruptions in the House. Instead, he called for comprehensive discussions on pertinent issues affecting farmers, development projects, and government performance. Somashekhar emphasized the significance of opposition leaders presenting their demands and concerns effectively within the parliamentary framework, fostering a healthy democratic process. Acknowledging the role of the opposition in a democratic setup, Somashekhar highlighted the importance of providing ample opportunities for opposition leaders to address the House. He emphasized the need for constructive engagement, suggesting that blocking the expression of opposition voices undermines the parliamentary essence. Moreover, Somashekhar emphasized the need for cooperation and dialogue, inviting former members of various panchayats and community representatives to engage in discussions concerning governance, development, and civic issues. Their presence underscored the collective commitment toward constructive dialogue and inclusive decision-making. In essence, Somashekhar’s stance reflects a commitment to parliamentary decorum, advocating for constructive debates, and underlining the importance of dialogue in addressing critical issues without resorting to boycotts that might hinder the democratic process.
