NEW DELHI
The Delhi High Court Wednesday sought the Centre’s stand on the adoption of an “Indian holistic integrated” approach in the area of medical education and practice instead of the “colonial segregated way” of having different streams of allopathy, ayurveda, yoga, and homeopathy, etc.A bench of Acting Chief Justice Vipin Sanghi and Justice Navin Chawla asked the central government to examine the prayers made in this regard by petitioner and lawyer Ashwini Kumar Upadhyay in his public interest litigation and file its response within eight weeks.Observing that the issue raised by the petitioner was a policy issue, the court said it would ask the government to treat the plea as a representation.The petitioner told the court the issue was not that of policy but the Constitution of India.The petitioner has claimed in the petition that the adoption of a holistic approach in the medical field, which would be a combination of modern and traditional medicine at the level of education, training, practice, and policies and regulations, would secure the right to health guaranteed under Articles 21, 39(e), 41, 43, 47, 48(a), 51A of the Constitution and improve the country’s doctor to population ratio as well as the healthcare sector.”We have an alternative force of medical professionals who have always been neglected by the Government and are capable of providing a supporting hand to uplift our health care status. There are 7.88 lakh Ayurveda, Unani, and Homeopathy (AUH) doctors. Assuming 80% availability, it is estimated that 6.30 lakh AUH doctors may be available for service and considered together with allopathic doctors, it gives a doctor population ratio of around 1:1000,” the petition has stated.The petitioner has informed that an integrated health system is present in several countries including China, Japan, Korea, and Germany, and claimed that “coordination of all medical systems” would benefit the patients.It is stated that modern medicine practitioners have remained confined to their niche which has restricted their practice and cannot benefit the diseased individuals by using other therapeutic regimens.The petitioner has further emphasised the negative impact of the “expanded pharmaceutical industry” and said that “so-called revolutionary medical innovations have in long-run proven to be dangerous causing severe and long-term side-effects but Centre is not introducing Holistic Integrated Healthcare System”.
