Rome
World No. 1 Aryna Sabalenka has sparked debate ahead of the French Open by suggesting that players could consider a boycott if they are not granted a larger share of tournament revenues at Grand Slam events.
Sabalenka said players deserve a higher percentage of earnings, arguing that their performances are central to the sport’s global appeal. “Without us, there wouldn’t be a tournament. At some point, a boycott might be the only way to fight for our rights,” she said.
Sabalenka, along with men’s world No. 1 Jannik Sinner and several top-ranked players, recently issued a joint statement expressing “deep disappointment” over prize money distribution at Grand Slams. While organisers have increased total prize pools, players claim their proportional share of revenues has declined.
At Roland Garros, overall prize money has been raised by around 10 percent to €61.7 million for 2026. However, players argue that their revenue share is projected to fall from 15.5 percent in 2024 to 14.9 percent this year, fuelling dissatisfaction.
Beyond prize money, players are also seeking improved representation, better healthcare provisions and enhanced pension systems from the four Grand Slams — the Australian Open, French Open, Wimbledon and US Open.
Not all players fully support the idea of a boycott. Iga Swiatek, a four-time French Open champion, called for dialogue instead. “The most important thing is communication with governing bodies. Boycotting is quite extreme,” she said, expressing hope for negotiations before the tournament begins on May 24.
Italian star Jasmine Paolini acknowledged that a boycott could be considered if players remain united, noting that tours like the WTA and ATP have made more progress in player welfare initiatives.
With tensions rising and the clay-court Grand Slam fast approaching, the dispute highlights growing concerns among players over financial fairness, setting the stage for potentially significant developments in tennis governance.
